Summary:
Basing on the official statistics of 20 European countries being published by the IMF and the European Union Association (EUA), this article analyzes the specific contents of autonomy; Impact of GDP and university autonomy indicators to 500 top universities towards the SJTU ranking; the real status of Vietnamese university autonomy and their specific contents of explanation and accountability. Some specific recommendations for policy on university autonomy were suggested: 1/ Strengthening role of university Board and extending its external members; 2/ Academic autonomy decreases "towards requirement" in the government documents; 3/ The government should continue to invest into research and technology transfer activities at universities towards the competitive funding mechanism; 4/Developing institutional capacity and human resources with management and leadership skills; 5 / Designing the social monitoring system at universities to fulfill their roles of accountability and responsibility
Refers:
[1] Thomas Estermann, Terhi Nokkala & Monika Steinel, (2011), University Autonomy in Europe II The Scorecard, European University Association. Belgium
[2] Wikipedia, (2016), Danh sách các quốc gia theo GDP danh nghĩa . https://vi.wikipedia.org/.../Danh_sách_ các_quốc_gia_theo_GDP_danh_nghĩa
[3] Academic Ranking of World Universities, (2016). http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Statistic s-2016.html#2
[4] Academic Ranking of World Universities, (2008), http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Statistic s -2008.html#2
[5] Đặng Ứng Vận, (2007), Phát triển giáo dục đại học trong nền kinh tế thị trường, NXB Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.
Journal: