REFORMING ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN JAPANESE LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS AT FPT UNIVERSITY THROUGH A SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH

REFORMING ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN JAPANESE LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS AT FPT UNIVERSITY THROUGH A SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH

Lai Xuan Thu thulx@fe.edu.vn FPT University Education Zone, Hoa Lac Hi-tech Park, Km29 Thang Long Boulevard, Hoa Lac ward, Hanoi, Vietnam
Summary: 
Reforming assessment and evaluation in foreign language education, including Japanese, is particularly important for private universities in the context of international integration. Grounded in social constructivist theory, which emphasizes that knowledge is co-constructed through social interaction and learner collaboration, assessment needs to move beyond outcome-based testing to process oriented approaches such as peer assessment and self-assessment. This study examined the current practices of Japanese language assessment for Information Technology students at FPT University by surveying 15 lecturers and 100 students. The findings show that both lecturers and students demonstrate readiness and positive attitudes toward social constructivist-oriented assessment. However, challenges remain, including students’ limited awareness of the approach, the uneven capacity of some lecturers, and insufficient institutional support. Based on these results, the paper proposes practical solutions to strengthen the effectiveness of applying social constructivist theory in assessment and evaluation within Japanese language education at the tertiary level. In particular, the study identified three focal aspects of assessment reform, namely objectives, criteria, and formats.
Keywords: 
Social constructivism
reform
Japanese
Assessment
evaluation.
Refers: 

[1] Ban Chấp hành Trung ương. (2025). Nghị quyết số 71 NQ/TW ngày 22 tháng 8 năm 2025 của Bộ Chính trị về đột phá phát triển giáo dục và đào tạo.

[2] Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, pp.97–114. Oxford University Press.

[3] Âu Đức Thắng, Hoàng Thanh Chung. (2017). Một số giải pháp nâng cao hiệu quả đổi mới phương pháp dạy - học bậc đại học ở Học viện Hậu Cần. Tạp chí Khoa học và Giáo dục, 136, tr.105-108.

[4] Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), pp.355-392.

[5] Khalid, A., Kazim, T., Diaz, K. R. V. & Iqbal, J. (2023). Breaking barriers in higher education: Implementation of cost-effective social constructivism in engineering education. Science for the People, 30(3), pp.1-15.

[6] McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking authentic assessment: Work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 86(4), pp.735-749.

[7] Nguyễn Hồng Giang (2023). Lí thuyết kiến tạo trong dạy học. Tạp chí Thiết bị giáo dục, 2 (283), tr.28-30.

[8] Nguyễn Hữu Châu (2012). Quan điểm kiến tạo trong dạy học, Tạp chí Tâm lí học, 6 (137), tr.18-25.

[9] Piaget, J. (1975). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. University of Chicago Press.

[10] Revati, N. (2024). Integrating constructivism, science education, and technology. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 12(5), pp.2707-2712.

[11] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Articles in Issue