[1] Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., Khatib, S. El, Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., … Sallam, M. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8.
[2] DeVellis, R. F. & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
[3] Du, L. & Lv, B. (2024). Factors influencing students’ acceptance and intelligence in use generative artificial elementary education: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24715–24734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12835-4.
[4] Du, W., Cao, Y., Tang, M., Wang, F. & Wang, G. (2025). Factors influencing AI adoption by Chinese mathematics teachers in STEM education. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-025-06476-x.
[5] Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M. & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ ITSE-06-2016-0015.
[6] Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi. org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
[7] Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Jarvela, S., Mavrikis, M. & Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour and Information Technology, 44(11), 2518–2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492 9X.2024.2394886.
[8] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[9] Hien, N. V., Duy, T. T. & Van, P. D. (2025). Bringing AI into teaching: Understanding Vietnamese teachers’ perspectives and pedagogical challenges. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 11(3), 335–347.
[10] Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for f it indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
[11] Hu, L., Wang, H. & Xin, Y. (2025). Factors influencing Chinese pre-service teachers’ adoption of generative AI in teaching: An empirical study based on UTAUT2 and PLS-SEM. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 12609–12631. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13353-7.
[12] Hu, W. & Shao, Z. (2025). Design and evaluation of a GenAI-based personalized educational content system tailored to personality traits and emotional responses for adaptive learning. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 28, Article 100735. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100735.
[13] Le, T. B. T. T., Ta, T. T. & Tang, M. D. (2025). ChatGPT in Vietnamese math classrooms: What are the influencing factors behind teachers’ adoption? Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 72–88. https:// doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202531924.
[14] Lu, G. & Ba, S. (2025). Exploring the impact of GAI assisted feedback on pre-service teachers’ situational engagement and performance in inquiry-based online discussion. Educational Psychology, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410 .2025.2489784.
[15] Marmoah, S., Supianto, Sukmawati, F., Poerwanti, J. I. S. & Yantoro. (2024). The elementary school teachers adoption of learning management system: A UTAUT model analysis. Ingenierie Des Systemes d’Information, 29(2), 715–722. https://doi. org/10.18280/isi.290233.
[16] Mulaudzi, L. V. & Hamilton, J. (2025). Lecturer’s perspective on the role of AI in personalized learning: Benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1571–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09615-1.
[17] Nguyen, H. N. & Ta, T. T. (2024). Developing a scale to identify factors influencing secondary school teachers’ behavior in implementing the 2018 general education program. Journal of Educational Science (HNUE), 69(2), 3–14. https://doi. org/10.18173/2354-1075.2024-0018.
[18] Rahimi, A. R. (2025). Developing and validating the scale of language teachers’ design thinking competency in artificial intelligence language teaching (LTDTAILT). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100420. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100420.
[19] Razzouk, R. & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi. org/10.3102/0034654312457429.
[20] Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M. & Rutecka, P. (2024). Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22943–22968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639 024-12765-1.
[21] Tzimas, D.& Demetriadis, S. (2025). K-12 teachers’ acceptance and resistance perceptions of learning analytics adoption: A mixed-methods approach. TechTrends, 69(2), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11528-025-01045-5.
[22] Ta, T. T. & Nguyen, T. N. (2022). A comparison between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM in assessing the training effectiveness evaluation model for teachers’ online continuing professional development. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 19(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.54607/ hcmue.js.19.2.3306(2022).
[23] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425 478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
[24] Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412.
[25] Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F. & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84–136. https:// doi.org/10.2307/270754.
[26] Wu, Q., Tian, J. & Liu, Z. (2025). Exploring the usage behavior of generative artificial intelligence: A case study of ChatGPT with insights into the moderating effects of habit and personal innovativeness. Current Psychology, 44(9), 8190 8203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07193-w