[1] A. Malderez and M. Wedell. (2007). Teaching teachers: Processes and practices. A&C Black
[2] Curriculum Planning & Development Division. (2010). English language syllabus: Primary & secondary (express/normal [academic]).
[3] D. Chun, R. Kern, and B. Smith. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning, Mod. Lang. J., vol. 100, no. S1, pp. 64–80.
[4] D. Dekker and C. Young. (2005). Bridging the gap: The development of appropriate educational strategies for minority language communities in the Philippines. Curr. Issues Lang. Plan., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–199
[5] Department of Education. K to 12 curriculum guide for English.
[6] Department of Education. (2009). Institutionalizing mother tongue-based multilingual education (MLE), [Online] Available: http://www.deped.gov.ph/ sites/default/files/order/2009/DO_s2009_74.pdf
[7] D. Nunan. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Q., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 589–613
[8] Department of Education. NAT overview and 2012 test results.
[9] Education for All Global Monitoring Report. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all.
[10] I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, E. J. Gonzalez, and S. J. Chrostowski. (2004). TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. ERIC.
[11] J. Wagner. (1991). Innovations in foreign language teaching, in Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Clause Faerch, Multilingual Matters Limited, pp. 288–306.
[12] J. S. Barrot. (2015). A sociocognitive-transformative instructional materials design model for second language (L2) pedagogy in the Asia Pacific: Development and validation, Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., vol. 24, pp. 283–297.
[13] J. S. Barrot. (2014). A macro perspective on key issues in English as second language (ESL) pedagogy in the postmethod era: Confronting challenges through sociocognitive-transformative approach. AsiaPacific Educ. Res., vol. 23, pp. 435–449.
[14] J. S. Barrot. (2019). English curriculum reform in the Philippines: Issues and challenges from a 21st century learning perspective, J. Lang. Identity Educ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 145–160.
[15] M. Kubanyiova and G. Crookes. (2016). Re-envisioning the roles, tasks, and contributions of language teachers in the multilingual era of language education research and practice, Mod. Lang. J., vol. 100, no. S1, pp. 117–132.
[16] M. Valerio. (2015). Factors affecting English instruction of grade 7 K to 12 curriculum as perceived by high school English teachers of the Division of Quirino, Int. J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 48–67
[17] N. H. A Rahman. (2014). From curriculum reform to classroom practice: An evaluation of the English primary curriculum in Malaysia, University of York.
[18] Pazzibugan. (2016). K + 12’ still struggling, IQUIRER. NET. Accessed: Jul. 05, [Online]. Available: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/419261/k-12-stillstruggling
[19] R. M. D. Nolasco, F. A. Datar, and A. M. Azurin. (2010). Starting where the children are: A collection of essays on Mother tongue-based multilingual education and language issues in the Philippines. 170+ Talaytayan MLE Incorporated.
[20] R. Tupas. (2015). Inequalities of multilingualism: Challenges to mother tongue-based multilingual education, Lang. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 112–124.
[21] Seameo Innotech. (2012). K to 12 toolkit: Resource guide for teacher educators, school administrators and teachers, Quezon City SEAMO INNOTECH.
[22] UNESCO. Philippines Education for All 2015 review report
[23] UNESCO. Philippines Education for All 2015 review report. UNESCO. (2012). Why language matters for the millennium development goals.
[24] Unicef. (2000). Defining Quality in Education: A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of The International Working Group on Education
[25] The Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 framework definition, [Online]. Available: www.p21. org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_ Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf
[26] T. G. Wiley and O. García. (2016). Language policy and planning in language education: Legacies, consequences, and possibilities, Mod. Lang. J., vol. 100, no. S1, pp. 48–63.
[27] Y. G. Butler and M. Iino. (2005). Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 ‘action plan. Lang. Policy, vol. 4, pp. 25–45.
[28] Y. Kirkgöz. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education, Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1859–1875.