A CYCLE OF ORGANIZING CONTINUING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT  “C-EPD” IN QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Nguyen Tien Hung

Nguyen Tien Hung	hungnt@vnies.edu.vn	The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences 101 Tran Hung Dao, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi, Vietnam

Summary:

Quality assurance of educational institutions has been playing an important role in improving quality to meet the social demands of training, scientific research, and community services that contributes for developing the social - economy of the nation and local. In addition, a cycle of organizing continuing quality improvement always sees as a core component in the quality assurance of educational institutions. Based on PDCA, this researching article proposed a cycle of C-EPD (C - Checking; E - Evaluating; P - Planning; D - Doing) consisted of three stages divided into 08 steps which have closing relationship by the way that the product of this process is an input for the next one. The stages and steps were: (Steps 1 and 2A, 2B) A process of organization of checking, evaluating the quality’s situation for identifying problems to improve; (C-E); (Steps 3-5) A process of planning for improving quality (P); and (Steps 6-7) A process of organizing and leading realization of strategies/solutions for improving quality (D). These researching results contribute for improving the quality of the quality assurance activities of educational institutions in practices.

View file

Keywords:

Quality assurance

educational institution

quality Improving

Checking - Evaluating - Planning - Doing quality

stakeholders

Refers:

[1] Nguyễn Tiến Hùng, (2015), Quản lí chất lượng trong giáo dục, Giáo trình sau đại học, NXB Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, ISBN: 978-604-62-1690-2.

[2] Andrews, L, (Mar 4, 2021), PDCA: Plan, Do, Check, Act, SensrTrx Sam.

[3] Esaki, K, (2016), Common Management Process Model of New TQM Based on the Situation Analysis, Intelligent Information Management, 8, p.181-193, ISSN Online: 2160-5920, ISSN Print: 2160-5912.

[4] Software Testing Help, (June 28, 2021), Difference Between Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA Vs QC), © COPYRIGHT SOFTWARETESTINGHELP 2021.

[5] Nguyễn Tiến Hùng, (01/2019), Quản lí huy động nguồn lực phát triển cơ sở giáo dục, Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, số 13, tr.07-11, ISSN: 2615-8957.

[6] Nguyễn Tiến Hùng, (2014), Quản lí giáo dục phổ thông trong bối cảnh phân cấp quản lí giáo dục, sách chuyên khảo, NXB Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, ISBN: 978-604- 934-934-8.

[7] Wikipedia, (9 August 2021), PEST analysis.

[8] MindTools, (2021), SWOT Analysis – How to Develop a Strategy for Success, 12 MIND READ

[9] Nguyen, Tien-Hung - Fridere, James - Chu, XuanDung - Luong, Thi-Viet-Ha - Pham, Quoc-Toan - Dinh, Van-Hoat, (2021), Management of Primary Teachersaccording to the Approach of Competency-based

[10] Human Resources Management, Addaiyan Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, ISSN: 2581-8783 (Online), Volum 3 (Isue 06), p.93-116, DOI: 10.36099/ ajahss.3.6.8

[11] Kausar, S, (2014), Impact of Quality Culture on Employees’ Motivation: A Study on Education Sector of Pakistan, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 22 (7), pp.1082-1089

Journal:

No. 9, September 2022

VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES

THE VIETNAM NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES

A CYCLE OF ORGANIZING CONTINUING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT “C-EPD” IN QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS