MEASURING THE INTELLECTUAL ABILITY OF VIETNAMESE STUDENTS BASED ON STERNBERG’S TRIARCHIC THEORY OF INTELLIGENCE

MEASURING THE INTELLECTUAL ABILITY OF VIETNAMESE STUDENTS BASED ON STERNBERG’S TRIARCHIC THEORY OF INTELLIGENCE

Tran Huy Hoang hoangth@vnies.edu.vn The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences 101 Tran Hung Dao, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi, Vietnam
Dang Xuan Cuong cuongdx@vnies.edu.vn The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences 101 Tran Hung Dao, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Huong huongnt@vnies.edu.vn The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences 101 Tran Hung Dao, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi, Vietnam
Summary: 
Sternberg’s triarchic theory of intelligence has been widely used to measure different aspects of intelligence, including analytical, creative, and practical intelligence. This article introduces the development and pilot testing of an instrument to measure the intellectual ability of Vietnamese students. Based on Sternberg’s triarchic theory of intelligence, a framework for measuring students’ intellectual ability has been proposed, including three factors of Analytical, Creative, and Practical intelligence measured through the content of Logic and Mathematics, Vietnamese language, Problem solving, as well as Creativity in the three aspects of Verbal, Quantitative and Figural areas. The instrument is designed with items to measure each of these aspects. The pilot testing results on 1,283 students in grades 5, 9, and 11 in three provinces of Quang Ninh, Vinh Phuc and Thua Thien Hue have shown that the item response theory (IRT) can be used to assess the quality of the items in the instrument and to calculate the overall as well as the aspects of intelligence scores. The results indicate that, although correction will be required, the designed items essentially meet the measurement requirements. The selected score calculation method can provide useful information about the intellectual ability of Vietnamese students.
Keywords: 
Sternberg’s triarchic theory of intelligence
measurement tool
analytical
Creative
practical intelligence.
Refers: 

[1] Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J., & Caplan, B, (2020), Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology: Cham: Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer

[2] Gardner, H, (1983), Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, New York: Basic Books

[3] Guilford, J. P, (1967), The nature of human intelligence, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[4] Spearman, C, (2005), The nature of “intelligence” and the principles of cognition, New York: Arno Press.

[5] Sternberg, R. J, (1985), Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence, New York: Cambridge University Press

[6] Weng-Tink Chooi, Holly E. Long and Lee A. Thompson, (2014), The Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Level-H) is a Measure of g, Journal of Intelligence, Volume 2, Number 3, pp. 56-67(12)

[7] Wilson, M, (2005), Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[8] Nguyễn Công Khanh (chủ nhiệm), (2010), Nghiên cứu chỉ số thông minh (IQ) của sinh viên Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.

[9] Nguyễn Huy Tú, (2010), Mức độ sáng tạo của học sinh, sinh viên Việt Nam hiện nay, Tạp chí Giáo dục, số 233, tr. 6, 60.

[10] Nguyễn Huy Tú, (2010), Trắc nghiệm tâm lí học và ứng dụng vào đánh giá toàn diện học sinh ở Việt Nam, Tạp chí Giáo dục, số 229, tr.14-16

[11] Nguyễn Huy Tú, (2000), Trí tuệ cảm xúc - Bản chất và phương pháp chuẩn đoán, Thông tin Khoa học Giáo dục, số 80, tr.16-18.

[12] Trần Kiều, (2005), Nghiên cứu phát triển trí tuệ (chỉ số IQ, EQ, CQ) của học sinh, sinh viên và lao động trẻ đáp ứng yêu cầu công nghiệp hoá, hiện đại hoá, Đề tài Nhà nước, mã số KX-05-06.

Articles in Issue