ESTABLISH A LEARNING OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK FOR ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS IN VIET NAM

ESTABLISH A LEARNING OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK FOR ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS IN VIET NAM

Do The Hung dothehung1974@gmail.com Hung Yen University of Technology and Education Dan Tien Commune, Khoai Chau district, Hung Yen province, Vietnam
Summary: 
This study aims to establish a learning outcomes framework for engineering technology programs in Vietnam that aligns with international standards in the context of globalization and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Although many programs in Vietnam have achieved international accreditation, gaps remain between the existing learning outcomes and the expectations of international accreditation bodies. This research conducted a comparative analysis of learning outcomes frameworks from ABET, Engineers Australia, JABEE, ASIIN, and the Sydney Accord, in conjunction with Vietnam’s legal and educational frameworks. Based on this analysis, the study proposes an integrated framework comprising ten core program learning outcomes, each supported by specific performance indicators. The findings are practically significant for higher education institutions in Vietnam, enabling them to design programs that meet international standards while remaining contextually appropriate. Furthermore, the proposed framework supports the mutual recognition of qualifications between Vietnam and other countries.
Keywords: 
Engineering technology education
learning outcomes framework
international accreditation standards
Vietnam higher education
Sydney Accord
Refers: 

[1] ABET. (2025). Criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs, 2025–2026. https://www. abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/ criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-technologyprograms-2025-2026/

[2] ASIIN. (2021). Fachspezifisch ergänzende hinweise (FEH) der fachausschüsse 01 – Maschinenbau/ Verfahrenstechnik. https://www.asiin.de/files/content/ kriterien/ASIIN_FEH_01_Maschinenbau_ Verfahrenstechnik_ %202021-03- 16.pdf

[3] Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press

[4] Caspersen, J., Frølich, N., & Muller, J. (2017). Higher education learning outcomes–Ambiguity and change in higher education. European Journal of Education, 52(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ejed.12208

[5] Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Springer

[6] Davis, D. C., Beyerlein, S. W., & Davis, I. T. (2005). Development and use of an engineer profile. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/ development-and-use-of-an-engineer-profile.pdf

[7] Engineering Accreditation Council. (2024). Engineering programme accreditation standard 2024. Board of Engineers Malaysia. https://eac.org.my/v2/ wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Engineering

[8] Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001

[9] Harden, R. M. (2002). Developments in outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 117–120. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01421590220120669

[10] Hien, T. T. T., Thuy, D. T. T., & Phuong, V. M. (2023). Undergraduate training programs meeting the expected learning outcomes of the national quality framework: Status and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.26803/ ijlter.22.3.30

[11] Hong, H. T., Van Hung, T., Vu, N. Q., & Thao, D. T. T. (2024). CDIO-based teaching at universities: A case study for students majoring in electrical and electronic engineering technology, Vietnam. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 11(1), 66–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/ vnuer.4690

[12] International Engineering Alliance. (2021). Graduate attributes and professional competencies (Version 2021.1). http://www.ieagreements.org

[13] Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education (JABEE). (2019). JABEE criteria guide for accreditation of engineering education programs at bachelor level (2019 and later). Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education. https://jabee.org/doc/ Criteria_Guide_ENB_2019-.pdf

[14] Jones, E. (2018). The role of learning outcomes in enhancing the quality of higher education. Prepublication version. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/340310538

[15] Le, T. Q., Hoang, D. T. N., & Do, T. T. A. (2019). Learning outcomes for training program by CDIO approach applied to mechanical industry 4.0. J. Mech. Eng. Res. Dev, 42(1), 50–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.26480/ jmerd.01.2019.50.55

[16] Lê, H. A., & Phùng, T. H. G. (2024). Xây dựng hệ thống đo lường chuẩn đầu ra chương trình đào tạo của trường đại học theo chuẩn AUN-QA. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Quốc tế Hồng Bàng, 30, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.59294/HIUJS.30.2024.651

[17] Lê, H. T., & Nguyễn, T. B. N. (2019). Xây dựng chuẩn đầu ra chương trình đào tạo: Kinh nghiệm từ Trường Đại học Bách khoa Hà Nội. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, 14(02), 76–81. http://lib.yhn. edu.vn/bitstream/YHN/5250/1/N492.pdf

[18] Nguyễn Hữu Diễm Hương, & Scott George Danielson. (2017). Xây dựng, rà soát và đánh giá mức độ đáp ứng CĐR theo tiêu chuẩn ABET và AUN-QA cấp chương trình đào tạo. Tạp chí Khoa học Quản lí Giáo dục, (02)(14), 10–17. https://tapchikhqlgd.edu.vn/ wp-content/uploads/2024/01/02-NGUYEN-HUUDIEM-HUONG-SCOTT-GEORGE-DANIELSON. pdf

[19] Nguyễn, L. H., Phan, Q. H. H., Lê, T. L. G., Nguyễn, Đ. Đ. Đ., Phạm, N. H., Trần, Đ. T., & Ngô, T. T. D. (2021). Xây dựng chuẩn đầu ra theo khung trình độ quốc gia Việt Nam hướng tới kiểm định AUNQA: Nghiên cứu trường hợp ngành Công nghệ ki thuật Môi trường. Tạp chí Khoa học Công nghệ và Thực phẩm, 21(3), 169–182

[20] Nhàn, D. (2024, Tháng 9, 17). Top 10 cơ sở giáo dục đại học có nhiều chương trình đào tạo kiểm định nước ngoài nhất. Giáo dục Việt Nam. https://giaoduc.net.vn/ top-10-co-so-giao-duc-dai-hoc-co-nhieu-ctdtkiem-dinh-nuoc-ngoai-nhat-post245109.gd

[21] Passow, H. J., & Passow, C. H. (2017). What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 475–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20171

[22] Tri, N. M., Hoang, P. D., & Dung, N. T. (2021). Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on higher education in Vietnam: Challenges and opportunities. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 1–15. https://doi. org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS3.1350

[23] Zaitseva, K., & Quadrado, J. C. (2019, June). Learning outcomes for engineering education programs. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://doi. org/10.18260/1-2--33054

Articles in Issue