TEACHING STYLE: MODELS AND IMPACT FACTORS

TEACHING STYLE: MODELS AND IMPACT FACTORS

Tran Duong Quoc Hoa hoatdq@dnpu.edu.vn Dong Nai University No.9 Le Quy Don street, Bien Hoa city, Dong Nai province, Vietnam
Summary: 
Teaching style, recognized as one of the crucial aspects of pedagogical competence, is a significant factor influencing the change in students' behavior and their success in learning endeavors. The way teachers approach and convey knowledge to students is diverse and unique. By using theoretical research methods, the article outlines five typical teaching style models and elucidates the factors affecting teachers' teaching styles. The research results provide a scientific foundation for further studies on developing strategies for adjusting teaching styles to optimize the teaching and learning process.
Keywords: 
Teaching style
teaching style model
behavior
teachers.
Refers: 

[1] Yeşilyurt, E., Okudan, Ü., & Kizilaslan, B, (2020), Teaching style models: A comprehensive review in the context of theoretical basics, The Journal of International Social Research, 13(72), 722–745.

[2] Chan, S., Maneewan, S., & Koul, R, (2021), Teacher educators’ teaching styles: relation with learning motivation and academic engagement in pre-service teachers, Teaching in Higher Education, p.1–22, https:// doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1947226.

[3] Grasha, A. F., & Yangarber-Hicks, N, (2000), Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology, College Teaching, 48(1), p.2–10, https:// doi.org/10.1080/87567550009596080.

[4] Yoshida, F., Conti, G. J., Yamauchi, T., & Iwasaki, T, (2014), Development of an instrument to measure teaching style in Japan: The teaching style assessment scale, Journal of Adult Education, 43(1), p.11–19.

[5] Grasha, A. F, (1994), A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator, College Teaching, 42(4), p.142–149, https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1994.9926845.

[6] Aktan, S, (2012), Öğrencilerin akademik başarısı, öz düzenleme becerisi,motivasyonu ve öğretmenlerinöğretim stilleri arasındaki ilişki, Doktora tezi, Balikesir Üniversitesi.

[7] Karatepe, R., & Salman, M, (2022), The relationship between teachers’ teaching styles and their attitudes towards distance education, Journal of Advanced Education Studies, 4(1), p.1–14, https://doi. org/10.48166/ejaes.1087510.

[8] Fischer, B. B., & Fischer, L, (1979), Styles in teaching and learning, Educational Leadership, 36(4), 245–254.

[9] Üredi, L, (2006), İlköğretim I. ve II. kademe öğretmenlerinin öğretim stili tercihlerine göre öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin algılarının incelenmesi, Doktora tezi, Marmara Universitesi.

[10] Broudy, H. S, (1984), The best teacher you ever had: Three modes of teaching and their evaluation, Faculty Forum, Fourth National Institute on the Teaching of Psychology to Undergraduates, Clearwater Beach

[11] Hudak, M. A., & Anderson, D. E, (1984), Teaching style and student ratings, Teaching of Psychology, 11(3), p.177– 178, https://doi.org/10.1177/009862838401100316.

[12] Quirk, M. E, (1994), How to learn and teach in medical school: A learner-centered approach, New York: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.

[13] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L, (2020), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, p.1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.

[14] Assor, A, (2012), Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy, In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 421–439, New York: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_20.

[15] Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L, (2014), When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy, Journal of Educational Psychology

[16] González, A., Conde, Á., Díaz, P., García, M., & Ricoy, C, (2018), Instructors’ teaching styles: relation with competences, self-efficacy, and commitment in pre-service teachers, Higher Education, 75, 625–642, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0160-y 106(1), 258–267, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034007

[17] Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L, (2010), Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure, Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682.

[18] Liu, H., Liu, J., & Chi, X, (2014), Regulatory mechanism of self-determination involvement in higher education: Assessing Chinese students’ experiences, Higher Education, 67, 51–70, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10734-013-9640-x

[19] Grasha, A. F, (2002), The dynamics of one-on-one teaching, College Teaching, 50(4), p.139–146, https:// doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595895.

Journal: 

Articles in Issue