ADAPTING AND APPLYING THE TEACHING PRACTICES SCALE FOR VIETNAMESE GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHERS

ADAPTING AND APPLYING THE TEACHING PRACTICES SCALE FOR VIETNAMESE GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHERS

Truong Dinh Thang thang_td@qtttc.edu.vn Quang Tri Teacher Training College Km3, Highway No 9, Dong Ha city Quang Tri province, Vietnam
Summary: 
The teaching activities of teachers play a crucial role in improving the quality of educational activities and overall educational outcomes. Accurately assessing the current state of these activities helps identify areas for improvement, thus promoting teacher development programs focused on specific shortcomings and ultimately enhancing the quality of education. This paper presents the results of adapting the Teaching Practices scale by Ainley and Carstens [1] and applying it to assess the current state of teaching activities among general education teachers in Vietnam. The results indicate that the scale meets the necessary measurement standards and can be used to evaluate the current state of teaching practices. The research also reveals that teachers frequently engage in actions that positively impact students’ learning outcomes, reflecting a high level of teaching quality among the participants.
Keywords: 
Adaptation
teaching practices scale
educational quality
general education teacher
measurement standards.
Refers: 

[1] Ainley, J. and R. Carstens. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 187, OECD Publishing, Paris, https:// doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en.

[2] Bellibaş, M. S. (2022). Empowering principals to conduct classroom observations in a centralized education system: does it make a difference for teacher self-efficacy and instructional practices? International Journal of Educational Management 37(3). DOI 10.1108/IJEM-02-2022-0086.

[3] Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50.

[4] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs.

[5] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modelling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing, Science 43(1), 115-135.

[6] Heggestad, E. D., Scheaf, D. J., Banks, G. C., Monroe Hausfeld, M., Tonidandel, S., & Williams, E. B. (2019) Scale adaptation in organizational science research: A review and best-practice recommendations, Journal of Management, 45(6), 2596–2627. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0149206319850280

[7] Huber, S.G. and Skedsmo, G. (2016). Teacher evaluation - accountability and improving teaching practices, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 105-109.

[8] Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability, Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.

[9] OECD. (2018). TALIS 2018 database, Download from từ https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/talis2018-database.html#data.

[10] OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report, OECD publishing, Paris

[11] Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 268–274. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x

Articles in Issue